1. What was Frederick Douglass’ theory for how to break a slave?
-Slaves must be thoughtless and accept anythig their masters do because they are the higher power. They must take what is given to them and be convinced that its what they earned.
3. Why wasn’t Frederick Douglas aloud to read?
-She didnt want him to read and become educated because as he would grow older and discover his identity and develop his own opinions on slavery, he may rebel or challenge it.
5. What is the difference between how southern and northern blacks were treated?in the North blacks were technically "free" but were given menial jobs and were not allowed to vote. They also still suffred violent attacks by white poeple and treated poorly. In the South blacks made up 35% of the population and were the main labkr force fueling the economy on large cash crop plantstions.
Advanced US History
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Assimilation or Resistance? 10/9/2012
1. The best Policy for the Tribes to Pursue: Resistance
~ The reason that resistance would be the best option for the Indians economically is because they could keep all their money in their economy without having to hand it over to the white people when they are in control. They wouldn't have to share all their resources as well and they could thrive independently.
~The social reason it would be better is that they would be able to preserve their culture for future generations. Their traditions would not be destroyed and even if they had to go to war with the English they would at least go down fighting with their pride.
~The Political reason is that they could be recognized as their won country and not a part of the English society. They would be free to be independent and form their own foundation of government for themselves.
2. The worst Policy for the Tribes to Pursue: Assimilation
~If the Indians chose Assimilation they would have to pay taxes and share all their land with the English, giving up all their precious hunting land and other resources
~The Social reason the Indians should not pick Assimilation is that their entire culture would become "Americanized" and would virtually become nothing. Future generations would know nothing about their culture.
~Politically if the Indians chose Assimilation they would be completely controlled by the English people.. They would have to abide by all of the American laws and practices.
~ The reason that resistance would be the best option for the Indians economically is because they could keep all their money in their economy without having to hand it over to the white people when they are in control. They wouldn't have to share all their resources as well and they could thrive independently.
~The social reason it would be better is that they would be able to preserve their culture for future generations. Their traditions would not be destroyed and even if they had to go to war with the English they would at least go down fighting with their pride.
~The Political reason is that they could be recognized as their won country and not a part of the English society. They would be free to be independent and form their own foundation of government for themselves.
2. The worst Policy for the Tribes to Pursue: Assimilation
~If the Indians chose Assimilation they would have to pay taxes and share all their land with the English, giving up all their precious hunting land and other resources
~The Social reason the Indians should not pick Assimilation is that their entire culture would become "Americanized" and would virtually become nothing. Future generations would know nothing about their culture.
~Politically if the Indians chose Assimilation they would be completely controlled by the English people.. They would have to abide by all of the American laws and practices.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Tempest in the Wilderness Questions
1.How did Corn affect native society?
Corn was a staple food item for the Natives and was rich in their spiritual culture. Old native legends told of how corn saved them in their times of famine. Without it the natives would have died
2. Why was there such a difference between the Natives and the English? Who created the difference and why?
The Native and the English had morals that were almost complete polar opposites. Everything from the way they dressed to the way the treated their women ; the two cultures just clashed from the beginning. Either one of them didn't really create the difference single handedly ,but it was just they way things were when they came from different walks of life.
4. How were the Irish and the Natives alike?
4. The Irish and the Natives were both viewed as being "savages" to the English. According to the English; the Irish and the Natives dressed alike, had similar behaviors, and lived in similar type houses. To the English they were both viewed as the lowest class of the earth, even the poorest people had a social rank above them.
Corn was a staple food item for the Natives and was rich in their spiritual culture. Old native legends told of how corn saved them in their times of famine. Without it the natives would have died
2. Why was there such a difference between the Natives and the English? Who created the difference and why?
The Native and the English had morals that were almost complete polar opposites. Everything from the way they dressed to the way the treated their women ; the two cultures just clashed from the beginning. Either one of them didn't really create the difference single handedly ,but it was just they way things were when they came from different walks of life.
4. How were the Irish and the Natives alike?
4. The Irish and the Natives were both viewed as being "savages" to the English. According to the English; the Irish and the Natives dressed alike, had similar behaviors, and lived in similar type houses. To the English they were both viewed as the lowest class of the earth, even the poorest people had a social rank above them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)